Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 3/14/2025 12:01 PM, dbush wrote:
<Snipped mostly garbage>
Good luck trying to show you've refuted a proof that you've gone on
record as admitting is correct.
Just because PO can neither get his claims straight or his head out of
his ass, is no reason to copy his style of argument:
Unless I missed it, he has (probably by mistake) admitted that the
theorem with original definitions of terms is probably correct. That,
however, doesn't mean some particular proof of that theorem is
necessarily a valid proving.
The history of these nonsense threads show that POs original claim was
that a particular proof was bungled. There followed a few thousand
rebuttals where people repeatedly point out 1) he didn't know what a
proof was, 2) he didn't understand what was to be proved, and 3) he
didn't even understand the basic terminology of the field. His brain was
not capable of grokking the issues.
Now his personality disorders begin to add to his limited comprehension
problems. In particular his radical overestimate of his own intellect
and his needed to be worshiped. Rather than trying to learn more and
perhaps making a major, minor, or at least a fun contribution with hard
work, he embarks with a new two-part strategy: 1) claim the the
definitions of terms are wrong and 2) act out the role of a spoiled brat
and throw tantrums reminiscent of a disturbed 2 year old.
And, by the way, even if you can show (not that hard) that he is
completely fucked between the ears, it will not change a thing in his
limited mind.
He has made claims of being on a collision course with death due to
cancer. It may be true or it may be subtle crap that enhances his troll
attraction, i.e., everybody wants to help him out so he doesn't die with
trophies for Best Troll 1st Quarter 21st Century and winner DWIP (Dumb,
Whiny, Ignorant, Putz) All Time Usenet.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.