Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 29. Mar 2025, 18:06:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vs99b7$1q2ir$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29/03/2025 15:47, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:11:13 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote:
 
On 29/03/2025 09:51, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-28 14:14:10 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>
<snip>
>
If a native FORTRAN IV compiler can parse it then neos can parse it as
long as it is somehow expressable in the neos attribute grammar.
>
If you don't know how to express it in the neos attribute grammar then
nobody knows and neos is not universal, at lieast in the practical
sense.
>
>
You don't understand, Mikko. You probably think that "neos can parse it"
means that neos can parse it. What it really means is that /in Mr
Flibble's head/ neos can parse it, and anything in Mr Flibble's head is
right by definition, and /therefore/ neos can parse FORTRAN IV even if
it can't.
 I see no reason why neos can't parse FORTRAN IV, FACT.
What you can and can't see is neither here nor there. The FACT remains that neos /can't/ parse FORTRAN IV until the relevant schema has been written. To date (at least as far as we know) nobody has obliged.
I don't expect you to understand this; after all, you didn't understand it last time.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Mar 25 * Re: neos Universal Compiler35Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler28Mikko
17 Mar 25 i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler27Mikko
18 Mar 25 i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler26Mikko
18 Mar 25 i  +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Andy Walker
19 Mar 25 i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler20Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Alan Mackenzie
19 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Mikko
20 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Alan Mackenzie
20 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   `* Re: neos Universal Compiler15Mikko
28 Mar 25 i    `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV14Mikko
28 Mar 25 i     +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV5Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV4Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Jeff Barnett
30 Mar 25 i     i   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i     `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV8Mikko
29 Mar 25 i      `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV7Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i       +- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
30 Mar 25 i       +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Richard Heathfield
31 Mar 25 i       i `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Mikko
31 Mar 25 i        `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
17 Mar 25 i`- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
30 Mar 25 `* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Keith Thompson
30 Mar 25  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1joes
30 Mar 25  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Mikko
31 Mar 25   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal