Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 30. Mar 2025, 10:04:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <vsb1er$30dmg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-03-29 15:47:33 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:11:13 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote:
 
On 29/03/2025 09:51, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-28 14:14:10 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
 
<snip>
 If a native FORTRAN IV compiler can parse it then neos can parse it as
long as it is somehow expressable in the neos attribute grammar.
 If you don't know how to express it in the neos attribute grammar then
nobody knows and neos is not universal, at lieast in the practical
sense.
  You don't understand, Mikko. You probably think that "neos can parse it"
means that neos can parse it. What it really means is that /in Mr
Flibble's head/ neos can parse it, and anything in Mr Flibble's head is
right by definition, and /therefore/ neos can parse FORTRAN IV even if
it can't.
 I see no reason why neos can't parse FORTRAN IV, FACT.
I can see a reason why it can't be used for that purpose: you have not
told how it can be done. If you can't tell how to use neos then nobody
is going to use it. If you can't solve the small problem of tokenizing
the example lines
        REALITY IS, AS I MAY
        LOGICALLY SAY, REAL
        LOGICAL = WHAT I SAY
then nobody will try the bigger problem of tokenizing all of FORTRAN IV
or any later Fortran and parsing and compiling it.
It does not really matter what can be done if nobody is going to try.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Mar 25 * Re: neos Universal Compiler35Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler28Mikko
17 Mar 25 i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler27Mikko
18 Mar 25 i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler26Mikko
18 Mar 25 i  +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Andy Walker
19 Mar 25 i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler20Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Alan Mackenzie
19 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Mikko
20 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Alan Mackenzie
20 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   `* Re: neos Universal Compiler15Mikko
28 Mar 25 i    `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV14Mikko
28 Mar 25 i     +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV5Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV4Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Jeff Barnett
30 Mar 25 i     i   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i     `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV8Mikko
29 Mar 25 i      `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV7Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i       +- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
30 Mar 25 i       +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Richard Heathfield
31 Mar 25 i       i `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Mikko
31 Mar 25 i        `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
17 Mar 25 i`- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
30 Mar 25 `* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Keith Thompson
30 Mar 25  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1joes
30 Mar 25  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Mikko
31 Mar 25   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal