Sujet : Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1 --- STA
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 02. Apr 2025, 15:06:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <829df7c882a73597e03bfaf34aa7883cbb74acd3@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:36:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 3/31/2025 5:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/31/25 2:16 PM, olcott wrote:
A simulating termination analyzer is always correct to abort the
simulation and reject the input as non-halting when-so-ever this input
would otherwise prevent itself from halting.
>
But the input WILL halt, when it is correctly emulated.
Where "correct" is defined to disagree with the x86 language.
How is DDD incorrectly simulated to halt?
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.