Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 11. Apr 2025, 01:23:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <878qo74kbl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
"lim(x->c) f(x)=L" means the limit of f approaching c is L, not f(c)=L 'eventually'.
f at c is not defined (handled) in limit.

Correct.

lim 0.333...=1/3    ... The *limit* is 1/3, not 0.333...=1/3
0.3+0.33+0.333+...  ... The sequence converges to 1/3
Σ(n=1,∞) 3/10^n     ... The sum converges to 1/3 (or you can use lim)

The limit as the number of 3s increases without bound *is exactly what
we mean* by the notation "0.333...".  Once you understand that, it's
obvious that 0.333... is exactly equal to 1/3, and that 0.333... is a
rational number.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Apr 25 * Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof45Andy Walker
8 Apr 25 +* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof33Richard Heathfield
8 Apr 25 i`* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof32Andy Walker
8 Apr 25 i +* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof2Richard Heathfield
8 Apr 25 i i`- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Andy Walker
8 Apr 25 i +* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof2Fred. Zwarts
9 Apr 25 i i`- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Richard Damon
9 Apr 25 i `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof27wij
9 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof26Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof25wij
9 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof24Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof23wij
9 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof22Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof21wij
9 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof20Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof19wij
9 Apr 25 i          `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof18Richard Heathfield
10 Apr 25 i           `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof17wij
11 Apr 25 i            `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof16Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i             `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof15wij
11 Apr 25 i              +* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof8Alan Mackenzie
11 Apr 25 i              i`* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof7wij
11 Apr 25 i              i `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof6Richard Damon
11 Apr 25 i              i  `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof5wij
11 Apr 25 i              i   +- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Richard Heathfield
11 Apr 25 i              i   `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof3Richard Damon
11 Apr 25 i              i    `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof2wij
11 Apr 25 i              i     `- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Richard Damon
11 Apr 25 i              `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof6Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i               `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof5wij
11 Apr 25 i                +* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof2wij
11 Apr 25 i                i`- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Richard Heathfield
11 Apr 25 i                +- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Keith Thompson
12 Apr 25 i                `- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Richard Heathfield
8 Apr 25 +* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof10Andy Walker
8 Apr 25 i+* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof6Keith Thompson
9 Apr 25 ii+* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof4Alan Mackenzie
9 Apr 25 iii`* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof3Alan Mackenzie
9 Apr 25 iii `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof2Alan Mackenzie
9 Apr 25 iii  `- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Alan Mackenzie
11 Apr 25 ii`- Re: Does Mathematics Exist? (was Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Apr 25 i`* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof3Andy Walker
9 Apr 25 i `* Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof2Richard Damon
14 Apr 25 i  `- Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Apr 25 `- Re: Does Mathematics Exist? (was Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal