Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 4/14/2025 4:32 AM, joes wrote:Irrelevant. That's what it's required to report on to meet the requirements of being a halt decider / termination analyzer.Am Sun, 13 Apr 2025 14:54:35 -0500 schrieb olcott:THE DIRECT EXECUTION IS NOT WHAT IT SEESOn 4/13/2025 9:46 AM, joes wrote:To clarify: that *HHH* does not simulate DDD halting has no bearing onAm Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:57:43 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 4/3/2025 1:32 AM, Mikko wrote:Yes.On 2025-04-03 02:08:22 +0000, olcott said:THE FACT THAT DDD EMULATED BY HHH DOES NOT HALT IS NOT RELEVANT TO A>It is a truism that a correct x86 emulator would emulate itself
emulating DDD whenever DDD calls this emulator with itself.
Which does not agree or disagree with my comment nor say anything
about it,
and it doesn't clarify any aspect of your statement that i commented.
If there is any indirect connection to anything relevant that
connection is not presented, leaving your response unconnected and
therefore irrelevant.
So you did not reply to the immediated context.
>
CORRECT DECISION BY A HALT DECIDER?
its direct execution.
>
THUSCategory error. Algorithms aren't "forbidden" from reporting anything. They just compute exactly what they're programmed to compute.
FORBIDDING IT FROM REPORTING ON THE DIRECT EXECUTION.
THE ONLY RELEVANT THING IS THE PATHOLOGICAL SELF-REFERENCE BEHAVIOR THATDDD does not „specify” self-reference; simulating with HHH does.
THE INPUT FINITE STRING SPECIFIES.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.