Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT

On 4/20/25 1:14 AM, olcott wrote:

On 4/19/2025 2:42 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-04-18 16:19:23 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 4/18/2025 8:27 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 23:24:22 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>

On 16/04/2025 22:01, Mr Flibble wrote:

I, aka Mr Flibble, have uniquely identified this category error and
have thus solved the halting problem

>
No, Mr Flibble, you have solved the Mr Flibble Problem. Well done! You
may award yourself whatever cash prize you can find in your piggy bank.
Well done!
>
And now you'd hurry back to using all those naughty words while your
mummy's still out at the shops.

>
Partial deciders are a thing,

>
Yes they are and termination analyzers only need
be correct on at least one input.

>
Even in situations where an analyzer cannot determine the right answer
it must not give the wrong answer. Not halting is OK, and so is to say
that the answer cannot be determined.
>

 Cases of semantically invalid inputs must be rejected
as erroneous.
 

And what is semantically invalid about the actual program DDD?
Maybe your erroneous non-program function with undefined referant, but the D/DD/DDD when it includes the copy of the decider it is based on is fully defined and semantically valid.
You are just proviing your ignorance of the field.