Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/4/2025 2:01 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:Obviously, because you changed the input.On 04/05/2025 18:30, olcott wrote:ONLY IF YOU STUPIDLY IGNORE THE X86 LANGUAGEOn 5/4/2025 11:21 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:<snip>On 04/05/2025 17:06, olcott wrote:>
>
<snip>
>They simply guess that because DD(DD) halts that>
DD correctly simulated by HHH must also halt.
It's not a guess. If direct execution halts, so must the simulation.>>
Maybe you are confused between halting (reaching
a final halt state and terminating normally)
with stopping running for any reason such as
an aborted emulation. *THEY ARE NOT THE SAME*
Maybe you are confused between equality and inequality.
>
If DD halts when directly executed, then a correct simulation of DD must also halt.
THAT PROVES THAT REPLACING THE CODE OF HHH WITH AN UNCONDITIONAL SIMULATOR AND SUBSEQUENTLY RUNNING HHH(DD) IS
NOT THE SAME EXECUTION TRACE AS DIRECTLY EXECUTED DD(DD)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.