Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/6/2025 12:51 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:In your view, perhaps. But it takes a convincing argument to refute a major proof, and you don't have a convincing argument, just a long trail of people you've failed to convince.On 06/05/2025 00:30, olcott wrote:It refutes ALL of the conventional HP proofs.There are different ways of framing the problem.>
The only one that matters is that HHH(DD) does
correctly determine that DD never halts.
That may be the only one that matters to you.
Where 'incorrectly' is your code for 'undecidably'.The one that matters to computer scientists, though, is the one that shows why some questions are undecidable.Because they are are framed incorrectly.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.