Sujet : Re: Halting Problem: What Constitutes Pathological Input
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 06. May 2025, 19:58:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vvdm3r$3islm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 06/05/2025 18:14, Mr Flibble wrote:
I clearly defined what is meant by "pathological input" in the OP; you
don't get to redefine terms at will as an attempt to move the goal posts:
But you do. Got it.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within