Re: Halting Problem: What Constitutes Pathological Input

On 5/7/25 10:54 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/7/2025 9:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/7/25 11:48 AM, olcott wrote:

On 5/7/2025 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-06 18:05:15 +0000, olcott said:
>

That everyone here thinks that HHH can simply ignore
the rules of the x86 language and jump over the "call"
instruction to the "ret" instruction seems quite stupid
to me.

>
The halting problem does not prohibit such skip so in that sense
it is OK.
>
However, in order to correctly determine whether DD halts
it may need to know whether the called HHH returns and what it
returns if it does.
>

>
The call from DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly return.

>
Only because HHH can't be a correct emulator.
>

 Liar
 

It isn't, as you have stipulated what HHH is.
So all you are doing is adding to your lies.
Which LIE are you going to take back to just make your argument stupid?