Sujet : Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 09. May 2025, 01:05:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vvjgt1$28g5i$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/8/2025 6:54 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> writes:
On 5/8/2025 6:30 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 08/05/2025 23:50, olcott wrote:
[...]
If you are a competent C programmer
Keith Thompson is a highly-respected and very competent C
programmer.
>
*Then he is just who I need*
No, what you need is someone who is an expert in mathematical logic
(I am not) who can explain to you, in terms you can understand and
accept, where you've gone wrong. Some expertise in C could also
be helpful.
The key gap in my proof is that none of the comp.sci
people seems to have a slight clue about simple C
programming.
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
*THIS IS THE C PART THAT NO ONE HERE UNDERSTANDS*
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "return" instruction.
DDD correctly simulated by HHH is the same thing
as infinite recursion between HHH and DDD yet is
implemented as recursive simulation.
I doubt that any such person exists, but only for reasons related
to you.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer