Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/8/2025 11:50 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:In other words, this is just your normal lying to try to cover up you don't know what you are talking about, and digging your hole deeper.On 09/05/2025 01:14, olcott wrote:I am explaining is as a c language interpreter onlyDo you know what a C language interpreter is?>
Of course he does.
>
A C language interpreter is not absolved from the requirement to diagnose C syntax errors.
>
If you think that your x86utm.cpp code qualifies as a C language interpreter, you are mistaken. You don't even grant it access to the C code.
>
because its actual x86 basis seems over everyone's head.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.