Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/9/25 8:51 PM, olcott wrote:That a psychotic way to define a simulating termination analyzer.On 5/9/2025 7:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:Nope, as that *IS* the definition of a correct emulation of a non- halting input, as the definition of "correcdt emulation" is to exactly reproduce the behavior of that program, so if the program won't halt, neither can the emulation.On 10/05/2025 00:02, olcott wrote:>Correctly emulating one or more instructions <is>>
the correct emulation of 1 or more instructions
of DD. This is a truism.
No, it's not. Correct emulation would entail accurately simulating the whole of DDD's behaviour.
>
It is stupidly wrong to require the complete
emulation of a non-terminating input.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.