Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)

On 5/9/25 10:45 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/9/2025 9:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/9/25 8:51 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/9/2025 7:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 10/05/2025 00:02, olcott wrote:

Correctly emulating one or more instructions <is>
the correct emulation of 1 or more instructions
of DD. This is a truism.

>
No, it's not. Correct emulation would entail accurately simulating the whole of DDD's behaviour.
>

>
It is stupidly wrong to require the complete
emulation of a non-terminating input.
>

>
Nope, as that *IS* the definition of a correct emulation of a non- halting input, as the definition of "correcdt emulation" is to exactly reproduce the behavior of that program, so if the program won't halt, neither can the emulation.
>

 That a psychotic way to define a simulating termination analyzer.
 

What, psychotic to define a termination analyZer by the actual definition of a termination analyzer?
Where do you get your version of the definition?
It seems you just like to invent your own fantasy world which doesn't actually correlate to reality, and then lie about your fantasy being what is real.
Sorry, you don't get to redefine the terms, and any attempt just becomes a blantant lie.