Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 13. May 2025, 03:59:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <f606204043e2404ac63da8f520e360f4b96d63d4@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/12/25 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/12/2025 9:17 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
On 12/05/2025 02:25, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 12/05/2025 01:38, Mike Terry wrote:
On 11/05/2025 18:11, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 11/05/2025 17:44, olcott wrote:
Any yes/no question where both yes and no are the
wrong answer is an incorrect polar question.
>
Either DD stops or it doesn't (once it's been hacked around to get it to compile and after we've leeched out all the dodgy programming).
>
Done that.
>
And you still had code left?
>
It still stops.
>
Okay.
>
If the computer cannot correctly decide whether or not DD halts,
>
The decider says it doesn't stop..
>
I said "cannot >>>correctly<<< decide".
>
There are infinitely many deciders that could be given the input.  Some of them decide that particular input correctly, and some incorrectly.
>
PO's HHH is one of the ones that decide incorrectly.
>
 When "correctly" means to report on behavior besides
that behavior that the input actually specifies then
it is wrong.
Right, so the behavior of the partial emulation done by HHH is wrong.
By defintion, the behavior *IS* the behavior of the directly executed program it represents.

 When 2 + 3 = 5 this is determined by the rules
of arithmetic.
 When the behavior that the input specifies according
to the rules of the x86 language is non-halting then
HHH must report on this behavior.
But the behavior that the input specifies by those rules is HALTING, as that is what the actual sequence of the actual instructions of what you consider to be the input (The DDD calling the HHH that is at that location, which is the HHH that aborts and returns 0)'
So, by your requirement, HHH MUST return 1, but it returns 0,

 HHH cannot compute the mapping from its input to
the behavior of the directly executed DD() for the
same reason that
So? That is its problem, that *IS* the behavior of the input that it must report on.

 int sum(int x, int y) { return x + y; }
sum(3,2) can not compute any mapping to sum 5 + 7.
THE INPUT SPECIFIES SOMETHING ELSE.
 
Right, the input DDD calls the HHH that aborts and returns 0, and thus is haltig.
For HHH to presume (incorrectly) that the HHH that DDD calls will be something different and never return is just an error, an error cause by YOU the programmer being ignorant of what he was supposed to be doing and the rules that he was supposed to follow.
Thus, YOU ARE JUST WRONG.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 May 25 * Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable594olcott
5 May 25 +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Mikko
5 May 25 +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable19Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable18olcott
5 May 25 i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable17Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i  `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable16olcott
5 May 25 i   `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable15Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i    `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable14olcott
5 May 25 i     `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable13Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i      `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable12olcott
5 May 25 i       +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable7Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i       i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable6olcott
5 May 25 i       i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable5Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i       i  `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable4olcott
6 May 25 i       i   `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25 i       i    `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
7 May 25 i       i     `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
6 May 25 i       `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable4joes
6 May 25 i        `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3olcott
7 May 25 i         +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
7 May 25 i         `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Mikko
5 May 25 `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable573Richard Damon
5 May 25  +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable569olcott
6 May 25  i+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3Richard Damon
6 May 25  ii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
6 May 25  ii `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
6 May 25  i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable565olcott
6 May 25  i +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable561Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25  i i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable560olcott
6 May 25  i i +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable556Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25  i i i+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable552Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i ii+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable5Ben Bacarisse
7 May 25  i i iii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable4Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i iii +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i iii +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Heathfield
9 May 25  i i iii `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i ii+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable544olcott
7 May 25  i i iii+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable532Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i iiii+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable529olcott
7 May 25  i i iiiii+- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1dbush
7 May 25  i i iiiii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable527Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i iiiii `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable526olcott
7 May 25  i i iiiii  `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable525Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i iiiii   `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable524olcott
7 May 25  i i iiiii    +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable511dbush
7 May 25  i i iiiii    i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable510olcott
7 May 25  i i iiiii    i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable509dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i  `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable508olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i   `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable507dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i    `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable506olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i     `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable505dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i      `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable504olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i       `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable503dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i`- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable499olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable498dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable497olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i  `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable496dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i   `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable495olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i    +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i    i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i    i `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1dbush
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i    `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable491Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i     `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable490olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable488Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable487Mike Terry
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i +* Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)485olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i i+* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)474Fred. Zwarts
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)473olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)468Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i+* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)6olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii ii`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)5Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii ii `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)4olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii ii  `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii ii   `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)2olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii ii    `- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i+- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)460Keith Thompson
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i +- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Keith Thompson
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)127olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)126Keith Thompson
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)125olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)12Keith Thompson
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)11olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i +- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Keith Thompson
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i +- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)4Richard Heathfield
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i i`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)3olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i i +- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Heathfield
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i i `- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)4Fred. Zwarts
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i  `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)3olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i   +- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
10 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i   `- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Fred. Zwarts
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)100Richard Damon
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i+* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)2olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  ii`- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Keith Thompson
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i+* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)10Richard Damon
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  ii`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)9Keith Thompson
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  ii +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)2olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  ii +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  ii `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)3olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i+* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)67Fred. Zwarts
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i+- Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
10 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  i`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)19Mike Terry
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  +* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)3Richard Heathfield
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i i  `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)9Fred. Zwarts
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii i `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)331olcott
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i ii `* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)4Fred. Zwarts
9 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i i`* Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD)10olcott
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      i `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        i      `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
8 May 25  i i iiiii    i        `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1olcott
7 May 25  i i iiiii    +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable11Richard Heathfield
8 May 25  i i iiiii    `- Re: faithful simulations [was: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable]1joes
7 May 25  i i iiii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2Richard Heathfield
7 May 25  i i iii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable11dbush
7 May 25  i i ii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
6 May 25  i i i+- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1olcott
7 May 25  i i i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2Mikko
7 May 25  i i +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
7 May 25  i i +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Mikko
7 May 25  i i `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Heathfield
6 May 25  i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3Richard Damon
5 May 25  +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2Richard Heathfield
6 May 25  `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal