Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met

On 5/12/2025 9:26 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 13/05/2025 00:58, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

On the other hand, you are spending a lot of time arguing about his
knowledge and use of C.  Yes, it's awful.  He knows very little C and
the code is crap, but that/is/  a straw man -- it's the simplest part of
his argument to fix.

>
Although it was an attempt to motivate him to improve the code, it has become blindingly obvious that he's not interested, which is precisely why I am going to stop bothering.
>

 Do you really think that nit picky details
can refute the gist of what I am saying
that needs none of these details?