Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP

On 14/05/2025 05:54, olcott wrote:

On 5/13/2025 11:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

<snip>

>
Mr Olcott's response to this appears to be that we should allow H to set aside impossible inputs in the pursuit of some kind of meaningful answer.
>
What he fails to notice is that it isn't necessary to set impossible inputs aside. Why not? Because they're impossible.
>

 Incorrect requirements are possible when they
conflict with other requirements.

There is no requirement and no conflict. H cannot exist, and therefore no requirements (other than non-existence) can be imposed upon it.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within