Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP

On 5/14/2025 1:45 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 14/05/2025 19:18, olcott wrote:

On 5/14/2025 12:58 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 14/05/2025 18:46, olcott wrote:

 <snip>
 

PAY ATTENTION !!!

>
Oh, my dear dear chap - if I thought for a moment you had anything worth paying attention to, I'd be all ears.
>
But you have nothing but mindless repetition, over and over and OVER. For every article you post, I can pretty much guarantee that I've read 90% of it before.
>

>
I repeat the steps that prove my point until
someone actually pays attention to these points
that prove I am correct.

 And how is that strategy panning out for you?
 The more you repeat, the less attention you get. All you get is copy- paste rebuttals of your copy-paste claims.
 

THERE NEVER HAS BEEN ANY ACTUAL REBUTTAL OF ANY
OF MY ACTUAL CLAIMS. There has been rhetoric
that stupid people could mistake as rebuttal.
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
     input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
     would never stop running unless aborted then
For example every single attempt at showing how HHH/DDD
does not meet the exact meaning of words of the above
specification ALWAYS CHANGES THE WORDS IN THIS SPECIFICATION
AND THEN REBUTS THOSE CHANGED WORDS.
This may get some people condemned to actual Hell.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer