Sujet : Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 14. May 2025, 21:28:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <1d83d93f3e43c27a2c029200d2199444fedf52fa@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 14 May 2025 14:21:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 5/14/2025 2:17 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 14/05/2025 20:02, olcott wrote:
On 5/14/2025 1:56 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
Asked to publish, you didn't publish.
I am not going to publish a private email you freaking nitwit.
I published the words that he agreed to as I said that I did in the
linked paper.
Yeah, so you don't have proof.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.