Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 15. May 2025, 07:36:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <1004218$30b0c$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 15/05/2025 03:10, olcott wrote:
<snip>

Liar!
As arguments go, that one's less convincing than you might think.
If you can't lucidly explain why Mr Damon is at odds with the facts (and it seems you can't), we have to consider the strong possibility that he isn't.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 May 25 * What. A. Slog.24vallor
14 May 25 +* Re: What. A. Slog.2olcott
15 May 25 i`- Re: What. A. Slog.1Richard Damon
14 May 25 +* Re: What. A. Slog.20Mike Terry
14 May 25 i+* The exact words of this spec are met2olcott
15 May 25 ii`- Re: The exact words of this spec are met1Richard Damon
14 May 25 i`* Re: What. A. Slog.17Mike Terry
14 May 25 i `* HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification16olcott
14 May 25 i  +* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification7dbush
14 May 25 i  i+- Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification1olcott
14 May 25 i  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification5olcott
14 May 25 i  i +- Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification1dbush
15 May 25 i  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification3Mikko
16 May 25 i  i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification2olcott
16 May 25 i  i   `- Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification1Mikko
15 May 25 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification8Richard Damon
15 May 25 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification7olcott
15 May 25 i    +* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification5Richard Damon
15 May 25 i    i`* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification4olcott
15 May 25 i    i +* Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification2Fred. Zwarts
16 May 25 i    i i`- Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification1Mikko
15 May 25 i    i `- Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification1Richard Damon
15 May 25 i    `- Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification1Richard Heathfield
15 May 25 `- Re: What. A. Slog.1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal