Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?

On 5/15/2025 2:37 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-15 01:30:08 +0000, olcott said:
 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int main()
{
   DDD();
}
>
If HHH cannot report on the behavior of its caller
because this is a ridiculous requirement then how
can HHH report on the direct execution of DDD()
(AKA its caller).

 Your HHH can use all information that Flibble's decider can. Flibble's
decider can determine and report that DDD halts.
 

I asked you (not Flibble) to show exactly how the requirement
that HHH report on the direct execution of DDD()
[that requires HHH to report on the behavior of its caller]
is not nonsense.
I presume that you dodge because you already know that
it is nonsense yet want to remain disagreeable anyway.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer