Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP

On 5/15/2025 6:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 14.mei.2025 om 23:25 schreef olcott:

On 5/14/2025 4:14 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/14/2025 2:59 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/14/2025 1:45 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 14/05/2025 19:18, olcott wrote:

On 5/14/2025 12:58 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 14/05/2025 18:46, olcott wrote:

>
<snip>
>

PAY ATTENTION !!!

>
Oh, my dear dear chap - if I thought for a moment you had anything worth paying attention to, I'd be all ears.
>
But you have nothing but mindless repetition, over and over and OVER. For every article you post, I can pretty much guarantee that I've read 90% of it before.
>

>
I repeat the steps that prove my point until
someone actually pays attention to these points
that prove I am correct.

>
And how is that strategy panning out for you?
>
The more you repeat, the less attention you get. All you get is copy- paste rebuttals of your copy-paste claims.
>

>
THERE NEVER HAS BEEN ANY ACTUAL REBUTTAL OF ANY
OF MY ACTUAL CLAIMS. There has been rhetoric
that stupid people could mistake as rebuttal.
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
     input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
     would never stop running unless aborted then
>

>
And *yet again* you lie by implying Sipser agrees with your interpretation of the above when definitive proof has been repeatedly provided that he did not:
>

>
If that was actually true then you could provide an
alternative meaning for the exact words stated above.
>
I keep challenging you to provide this alternative
meaning and you dodge because you know that you are
lying about there being any alternative meaning
FOR THE EXACT WORDS LISTED ABOVE.
>

 It has been proven many times that Sipser agreed to a vacuous statement.

Mike provided a full explanation of exactly
how my simulating termination analyzers are
exactly defined by the exact words above.
On 5/14/2025 7:36 PM, Mike Terry wrote:

Why do you always pretend that nothing was proven, when you only did not understand the proofs?
Please, face the facts, not your dreams. Come out of rebuttal mode and try to think!
Please, face the facts, not your dreams

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer