Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/16/2025 10:48 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:<snip>On 16/05/2025 16:10, olcott wrote:
The crucial words - *so* crucial that you keep on repeating them - are 'Anyone who knows C'.Sure when you make sure to totally ignore crucialAnyone that knows C can tell that when HHH does simulate>
DDD correctly that it keeps getting deeper in recursive
simulation until aborted or OOM error.
Anyone who knows C knows that there isn't much HHH can do with the pointer value it's given. It can call DDD:
>
(*p)();
>
words
then by using the strawman error on these dishonestlyI didn't change your words; I just rebutted them.
changed words they are easy to rebut.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man"A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion."
On the other hand when honest C programmers seeIf you are claiming to have written a C interpreter, that's a huge claim without any evidence whatsoever to support it.
those words they will think of something like a C
interpreter written in C is doing the simulation.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.