Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 17/05/2025 00:59, olcott wrote:Only damned liars would remove this key context.On 5/16/2025 10:48 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:<snip>On 16/05/2025 16:10, olcott wrote:
When you dishonestly remove the context that you areThe crucial words - *so* crucial that you keep on repeating them - are 'Anyone who knows C'.>Anyone that knows C can tell that when HHH does simulate>
DDD correctly that it keeps getting deeper in recursive
simulation until aborted or OOM error.
Anyone who knows C knows that there isn't much HHH can do with the pointer value it's given. It can call DDD:
>
(*p)();
>
Sure when you make sure to totally ignore crucial
words
You don't.
then by using the strawman error on these dishonestlyI didn't change your words; I just rebutted them.
changed words they are easy to rebut.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man"A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion."
When you said "Anyone who knows C" (as you have said very often), you yourself opened the discussion.
If you don't want people to attack your woeful understanding if the language, don't make the claim that you know the language.
On the other hand when honest C programmers seeIf you are claiming to have written a C interpreter, that's a huge claim without any evidence whatsoever to support it.
those words they will think of something like a C
interpreter written in C is doing the simulation.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.