Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/16/2025 2:07 AM, Mikko wrote:No, it does not. Simulators I have made never use multitasking.On 2025-05-15 21:35:24 +0000, olcott said:The simulation of one function in the same program
On 5/15/2025 4:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:Simulation is not a multi-tasking problem so knowledge of multi-taskingOn Thu, 15 May 2025 16:11:35 -0500, olcott wrote:Anyone that is intimately familiar with how multi-tasking
On 5/15/2025 3:59 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:It is not possible to make this work even by "writing an operating system"On Thu, 15 May 2025 15:47:16 -0500, olcott wrote:Since HHH does correctly simulate itself simulating DD we have complete
I overcome the proof of undecidability of the Halting Problem in thatIt is not possible for HHH to simulate DD because we are already inside
the code that "does the opposite of whatever value that HHH returns"
becomes unreachable to DD correctly simulated by HHH.
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
HHH simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to simulate itself again over and
over until HHH sees this repeating pattern and aborts or both HHH and
DD crash due to OOM error.
DD when we call HHH:
proof that you are wrong.
I had to write the whole x86utm operating system to make this work.
so whatever you think you are doing it isn't addressing my core point: you
are NOT *fully* simulating DD by HHH because you are already inside DD
when you are calling HHH.
/Flibble
operating systems work will understand how HHH could
emulate itself emulating its input.
operating systems is not relevant.
by another function in the same program does
require cooperative multi-tasking switching from
the simulator to the simulated and back.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.