Sujet : Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 18. May 2025, 20:22:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100dc21$14tvf$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/18/2025 2:17 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2025 14:12:32 -0500, olcott wrote:
>
They totally lack any understanding of how actual reasoning shows how
these elements actually interrelate with each other. To them false
assumptions are treated as axioms.
Be careful, according to Alan Mackenzie this is libellous because Alan
Mackenzie is a tit.
/Flibble
That is just not the way that libel actually works.
https://dictionary.justia.com/reckless-disregard-of-the-truthWhen my reviewers call me a liar yet fail to show any mistake
THIS IS LIBELOUS.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble
Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble