Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 19. May 2025, 10:07:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <100esd9$1hq2q$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-05-18 19:22:41 +0000, olcott said:

On 5/18/2025 2:17 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2025 14:12:32 -0500, olcott wrote:
 
 They totally lack any understanding of how actual reasoning shows how
these elements actually interrelate with each other. To them false
assumptions are treated as axioms.
 Be careful, according to Alan Mackenzie this is libellous because Alan
Mackenzie is a tit.
 /Flibble
 That is just not the way that libel actually works.
That depends on location. What you post in Usenet is visible everywhere
and any country and state may therefore consider it a prosecutable crime.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 May19:58 * Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble5Alan Mackenzie
18 May20:12 +* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble3olcott
18 May20:22 i`* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble2olcott
19 May10:07 i `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Mikko
18 May20:36 `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal