Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/20/2025 2:13 AM, Mikko wrote:So, why have you changed the definition of question a Halt Decider is supposed to answer?On 2025-05-20 04:24:02 +0000, olcott said:The strawman fallacy is stipulated to be incorrect
>On 5/19/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2025-05-18 20:19:19 +0000, olcott said:>
>>>
You keep the strawman fallacy.
A straw man fallacy is a (usually) correct refutation of something.
that is what the word "fallacy" means.
So, why have you changed the definition of question a Halt Decider is supposed to answer?Any attempt to refute X by changing the subject to YIt seems quite stupid to say that an error of reasoning>
is correct. You might as well have said all dogs are cows.
A straw man fallacy is not an error of reasoning. It is a false
attribution of the claim that is refuted.
>
is dishonest.
So, why have you changed the definition of question a Halt Decider is supposed to answer?How many times do I have to repeat this before you*The rules of correct reasoning define it as incorrect*>
If the correctness of an inference depends on who presented the
claim the those "rules of correct reasoning" are unsound.
>
notice ALL of the words that I said?
Any attempt to refute X by changing the subject to Y
is dishonest.
So, why have you changed the definition of question a Halt Decider is supposed to answer?How many times do I have to repeat this before youDescription: Substituting a person’s actual>
position or argument with a distorted,
exaggerated, or misrepresented version
of the position of the argument.
Which is a false attribution of the claim that is not relevant to
the correctness of the proof or refutaion of the presented version.
That quote confirms my claim and contradicts your counter claim.
>
notice ALL of the words that I said?
Any attempt to refute X by changing the subject to Y
is dishonest. Natural born liars may never get this.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.