Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 21/05/2025 10:23, Mikko wrote:Recently his primary methods have been various straw man and ad hominemOn 2025-05-20 14:42:36 +0000, olcott said:I have suggested to him that he puts ALL of the words --- all the important ones, anyway --- on a Web site so that he doesn't feel obliged to post reams and reams of copy-paste over and over. It would be one single place where he can make himself abundantly clear.
On 5/20/2025 2:13 AM, Mikko wrote:True, but the incorrectness is in the atribution of the claim,On 2025-05-20 04:24:02 +0000, olcott said:The strawman fallacy is stipulated to be incorrect
On 5/19/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2025-05-18 20:19:19 +0000, olcott said:
You keep the strawman fallacy.A straw man fallacy is a (usually) correct refutation of something.
that is what the word "fallacy" means.
not in the refutation. If there is a fallacy in the refutation
then it is called by some other term, depending on the what is
wrong there.
Yes, but that hasn't stopped you.Any attempt to refute X by changing the subject to YIt seems quite stupid to say that an error of reasoningA straw man fallacy is not an error of reasoning. It is a false
is correct. You might as well have said all dogs are cows.
attribution of the claim that is refuted.
is dishonest.
You can never find out because you can't determine what I have noticedHow many times do I have to repeat this before you*The rules of correct reasoning define it as incorrect*If the correctness of an inference depends on who presented the
claim the those "rules of correct reasoning" are unsound.
notice ALL of the words that I said?
and what not.
But of course he can't afford to be abundantly clear, because if he nails his point down in stone it will be too easy for his readership to point out all the holes.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.