Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
Op 25.mei.2025 om 20:42 schreef olcott:I dared you to show my mistake your failure to evenOn 5/25/2025 1:07 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:Again a baseless ad hominem attack, showing lack of counter arguments.Op 25.mei.2025 om 18:39 schreef olcott:>On 5/25/2025 10:49 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 25.mei.2025 om 16:36 schreef olcott:>On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:Why repeating this bug in HHH?On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:>
>So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that myself and Peter>
Olcott have to fight against.
Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against dishonesty.
If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and
nothing would be left.
>
_DDD()
[00002192] 55 push ebp
[00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d pop ebp
[000021a3] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
>
Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according
to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction final halt state.
That everyone that understands these things
sees that there is no bug makes your statement
the kind of reckless disregard for the truth
that loses defamation cases.
>
In other words by objective standards: YOU ARE A LIAR
>
Ad hominem attacks showing lack of counter arguments.
When you are objectively a liar then calling
you a liar is merely stating the facts.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.