Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 5/25/2025 3:28 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:On 5/25/2025 11:59 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
That everyone that understands these things
sees that there is no bug ....
That is untrue. The bug is clear to anybody who understands C code.
OK then to prove that you are not a damned liar
(you won't do this because you know that you are a liar)
show how DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules
of the x86 language reaches its own "ret" instruction
final halt state.
You've got a wierd notion of what it means to be a liar.
FIND THE BUG ASSHOLE !!!
You're not a nice person. The bug in question has been pointed out many
times, in particular by Fred.
I am not going to be a nice person to those that
are lying about my work.
Being a nice person in this case is weakness and invitation to more
abuse.
_DDD()
[00002192] 55 push ebp
[00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d pop ebp
[000021a3] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
Alluded to is not the same as pointing the
exact machine address where DDD emulated by
HHH breaks the rules of the x86 language
such that DDD emulated by HHH reaches its
own "ret" instruction.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.