Re: Bad faith and dishonesty

On 5/25/25 4:53 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2025 3:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/25/25 4:30 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2025 3:05 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/25/2025 3:56 PM, olcott wrote:

*Mike understood this perfectly*
On 5/14/2025 7:36 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
--------- Sipser quote -----
    If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D until H
    correctly determines that its simulated D would never stop running
    unless aborted then H can abort its simulation of D and correctly
    report that D specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
----------------------------
>
we can easily interpret that as saying exactly what I said a SHD
does above.  It tells PO that in the tight loop example, H correctly
simulates as far as [A], at which point it correctly determines that
"its simulated input would never stop running unless aborted", so
it can decide "non-halting".
>
All correct and natural, and no deliberately
false premises to mislead PO.
>
On 5/14/2025 7:36 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
https://al.howardknight.net/? STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C1003cu5%242p3g1%241%40dont-email.me%3E

>
And you dishonestly left out the part that immediately follows where he states that you are wrong:
>

>
*VERFIED FACT*
Mike Terry Proves ---
How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met

>
Nope.
>
You don't understand what he said.
>

 Yes I did and you know I did and you risk
eternal damnation by saying otherwise.
 

No, because you think your DDD that doesn't contain the code of HHH as part of it can be simulated.
YOu *THINK* you know what he said, because you filter everything you hear through your false perception filter that you brainwashed yourself to use.
Sorry, but all you are doing is PROVING that you are too stupid to understand what people are saying,
This is shown by the fact that you can not break down your arguments into something more basic, or quote realiable sources for where you get your "facts".
These are the classical signes of a make-believe system, as it has no real foundation, and exploring its foundation breaks it.
You are the poster child for Dunning-Kruger effect.
Sorry, but if you don't fix your mindset, you will be joining your disproven ideas in that lake of fire that you like threatening people with.
But then, Liars will call other people liars, without being able to back up what the lies actually are.
Note how I spell out the details of your lies, and you just answer back by repeating them, as you have NOTHING to argue about the basis I use to point out why they are lies, only you can't imagine how that could be.
That is your problem, you can't think or imagine, because you have imprissioned your intellect in the cage of your own brainwashing so you don't dare look at other things, as they might show that you have been wrong all this time.