Re: Atheism and morality

On 2025-05-26 16:16:29 +0000, olcott said:

On 5/26/2025 11:09 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.mei.2025 om 17:11 schreef olcott:

On 5/26/2025 3:55 AM, vallor wrote:

On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:43:17 -0500, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote in
<100vvd5$1i93o$2@dont-email.me>:
 

On 5/25/2025 3:20 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Sun, 25 May 2025 14:40:38 -0500, olcott wrote:
 

On 5/25/2025 2:39 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/25/2025 3:04 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2025 1:48 PM, dbush wrote:

On 5/25/2025 2:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/25/2025 11:59 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/25/2025 10:49 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 25.mei.2025 om 16:36 schreef olcott:

On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

 

So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that
myself and Peter Olcott have to fight against.

 

Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against
dishonesty.
If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop,
too,
and nothing would be left.

 

_DDD()
[00002192] 55             push ebp [00002193] 8bec
mov ebp,esp [00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192 [0000219a]
e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH [0000219f]
83c404         add esp,+04 [000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
[000021a3] c3             ret Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]

 

Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according to the
rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
instruction final halt state.

Why repeating this bug in HHH?

 

That everyone that understands these things sees that there is
no bug ....

 That is untrue.  The bug is clear to anybody who understands C
code.
 

OK then to prove that you are not a damned liar (you won't do this
because you know that you are a liar)
show how DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules of the x86
language

 Which doesn't happen as you have admitted on the record:
 

You Are the epitome of bad faith and dishonesty.

 That I call you out on your lies and back it up with evidence is
anything but.

 You must be an atheist or you would fear telling these lies.

 I am an atheist mate and atheists have morals, arguably better morals
than you as we do not do good things just for reward or to avoid
punishment.
 /Flibble

 Atheists can have good morals.
Christians may be aware that the bible says:
Revelations 21:8 all liars, shall have their part in the lake which
burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

 Damnation doctrine is spiritual terrorism, and certainly
has no place being discussed in comp.theory.
 Have you considered the "common denominator" in these discussions,
and contemplated the possibility that you might actually be mistaken?
 

 If I actually was mistaken then someone could
point out the actual mistake. When I dare anyone
to do that they change the subject.
 

 No, when your actual mistakes are pointed out,

 It is always some counter-factual claim
that can be proven false.

Your claims are often proven false but you only present tehm
as counter-factual.
--
Mikko