Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1

On 6/4/2025 10:06 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/4/2025 8:48 PM, dbush wrote:

On 6/4/2025 9:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/4/2025 8:28 PM, dbush wrote:

 

>
DDD emulated by HHH1 emulating HHH  DDD emulated by HHH emulating HHH
[00002183] push ebp      ;          [00002183] push ebp      ;
[00002184] mov ebp,esp   ;          [00002184] mov ebp,esp   ;
[00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD      [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
[0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH      [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH
                                     ### HHH aborts ###
>

 *That is dishonest*

No, that is the *fact* of what happens when HHH1 emulates DDD

HHH1 emulates DDD once and this matches

The one time that the outer HHH emulates DDD, up to the point that HHH aborts

 DDD emulated by HHH1              DDD emulated by HHH
[00002183] push ebp               [00002183] push ebp
[00002184] mov ebp,esp            [00002184] mov ebp,esp
[00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD    [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
[0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH    [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH
 *THE MATCHING IS NOW USED UP*
*THE MATCHING IS NOW USED UP*
*THE MATCHING IS NOW USED UP*

False.  HHH1 is still simulating the left side by simulating HHH as shown above.