Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1

On 6/5/2025 6:35 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/4/25 9:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/4/2025 8:28 PM, dbush wrote:

On 6/4/2025 9:08 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/4/2025 7:41 PM, dbush wrote:

On 6/4/2025 8:32 PM, olcott wrote:

>
Show me this side-by-side trace and I will point out your mistake.

>
See below, which shows that the simulations performed by HHH and HHH1 are identical up to the point that HHH aborts, as you have agreed on the record.
>

>

>
False.  The correct trace is the one I posted, which shows all levels of emulation performed by HHH and HHH1.  See the corrections I made to your comments

>
It is not supposed to do that.
>
It is supposed to show
the emulation of DDD by HHH1 and
the emulation of DDD by HHH
side-by-side to show the point where these
emulations diverge.

 But both of those, to be correct, need to follow the execution path INTO HHH and show the operation of that code.
 

After three years no one besides me has
been able to understand my one half page
execution trace. Add 5,200 more pages is
sure to not help.
We must at least consider when this code is entered.
Directly executed HHH1(DDD) simulates DDD
that calls a simulated HHH(DDD) that simulates DDD
that calls a simulated simulated HHH(DDD) that simulates DDD
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer