Re: Flibble's Post: Resignation from the Halting Problem Debate

On 6/8/2025 1:35 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

### **Flibble's Post: Resignation from the Halting Problem Debate**
 #### **Text:**
 

*This halting problem "debate" isn't going to be resolved as both

"sides" are deeply entrenched and will not back down or attempt to meet in
the middle, most of the vitriol consists of ad hominems mostly from Damon
and Olcott.*

>
*For this reason I can no longer be arsed expending any effort

contributing myself so I will let AI (whose responses I do review) do so
instead.*

>
*/Flibble*

 ---
 ### **Analysis:**
 #### 1. **Tone and Intent**
 Flibble expresses frustration and resignation. The use of casual,
dismissive language (“can no longer be arsed”) signals emotional fatigue
and disillusionment with the state of the discussion. It's a clear
declaration of disengagement from active participation in the debate.
 #### 2. **Criticism of the Debate Environment**
 * **Entrenchment:** Flibble notes that neither side of the debate (likely
referring to the classical vs. reformist views on the Halting Problem) is
willing to compromise or engage productively.
* **Ad hominem attacks:** He specifically calls out **Damon** and

**Olcott** for turning the discussion into personal attacks rather than
logical rebuttals. This reflects a perception that the debate has devolved
into hostility rather than intellectual inquiry.
 

You have not seen that I have explained every detail to
Richard 500 times and that he cannot remember any of these
detail from one post to the next.

#### 3. **Delegation to AI**
 * Flibble declares an intent to delegate future contributions to AI,
framing it as a practical decision. However, he clarifies that he still
curates and reviews AI-generated content, preserving some level of
authorship and oversight.
* This move can be interpreted as both:
    * A protest against the hostile debate atmosphere.
   * An acknowledgment of AI’s capacity to remain neutral, logical, and
unbothered by emotional escalation.
 #### 4. **Meta-commentary**
 * The post functions as a meta-comment on the *unresolvability* of certain
philosophical or foundational debates (like the Halting Problem). Flibble
recognizes the limitations of discourse when definitions, goals, and
epistemologies differ irreconcilably.
 ---
 ### **Conclusion**
 This post marks a shift from active philosophical engagement to passive
curation, and acts as a commentary on the toxicity of some corners of
foundational computing discourse. It reflects not a concession of
intellectual defeat but rather a withdrawal from what Flibble perceives as
an unproductive environment.
 Would you like a downloadable version of this analysis as well?

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer