Sujet : Re: I am using AI because...
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 10. Jun 2025, 21:00:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102a2t4$1fcc5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/10/2025 1:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/10/25 11:25 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/10/2025 6:38 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 8:39 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/9/2025 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/9/25 2:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/9/2025 1:19 PM, joes wrote:
Am Sun, 08 Jun 2025 18:31:36 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:
>
This halting problem "debate" isn't going to be resolved as both "sides"
are deeply entrenched and will not back down or attempt to meet in the
middle, most of the vitriol consists of ad hominems mostly from Damon
and Olcott.
For this reason I can no longer be arsed expending any effort
contributing myself so I will let AI (whose responses I do review) do so
instead.
>
I don't think anybody wants your AI posts. Please stop them.
>
>
*ChatGPT Analyzes Simulating Termination Analyzer*
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/385090708_ChatGPT_Analyzes_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer
>
The advantage of AI posts is that they lack biases.
>
>
Who says that AI has no bias?
>
WHen the input prompt includes lies (like you have shown yours to), the answer is unreliable.
>
Yet you do not dare try and find even a single
mistake because you know that you are totally out-gunned.
>
>
Really? Then why how was I able to get your own AI prompt to admit that it was in error when you got it to say you were correct?
>
>
You never did this.
Sure I did, You willing to put a a million dollars that I didn't?
Something a liar would say.
date/time stamp and quote or you are a liar.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer