Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 2025-06-10 15:11:50 +0000, olcott said:That is a dishonest or stupid thing to say.
On 6/10/2025 6:15 AM, Richard Damon wrote:The article makes no attempt to prove anything.On 6/9/25 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:>On 6/9/2025 7:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 6/9/25 3:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:>"big fat ignorant liar" -- Damon>
>
There are no words.
>
/Flibble
Can you show me wrong?
>
Or are you complaining about me telling him the truth?
What about this paper that I wrote?
>
Severe anthropogenic climate change proven entirely with verifiable facts
>
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/336568434_Severe_anthropogenic_climate_change_proven_entirely_with_verifiable_facts
>
Which just shows you don't know the meaning of the word "prove".
What specifically do you believe is not proven?
Most of it is about the--
carbon dioxide concentration, which is usualy not regarded as an aspect
of climate. One diagram shows a clear but small chage of temperature
during 120 years.
Promised in the title but not given are proofs of "anthropogenic"
and "severe".
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.