Sujet : Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 12. Jun 2025, 16:51:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102et14$2ohps$8@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/12/2025 4:37 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 12.jun.2025 om 02:52 schreef olcott:
>
If you don't understand the difference between object
instances of OOP classes and the classes themselves
then you might not understand.
>
int main()
{
D(); // calls H(D) and the parameter to this H(D)
} // is not the caller of this instance of H(D)
>
The analyser should not decide about an instance, but about what is specified by the code.
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a sequence of configurations
that cannot possibly reach their own "return" statement
final halt state.
That you are insufficiently competent to see this is proven
by the fact that you have no rebuttal anchored in correct
reasoning.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer