Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique

On 6/22/25 10:42 AM, olcott wrote:

On 6/22/2025 4:32 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-06-21 22:48:01 +0000, olcott said:
>

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6857335b37a08191a077d57039fa4a76
ChatGPT agrees that I have correctly refuted every
halting problem proof technique that relies on the above
pattern.

>
If you like to play with ChatGPT you should ask it for
a solution to the halting problem.
>

 I gave you the link showing exactly what ChatGPT agreed to.
https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6857335b37a08191a077d57039fa4a76
 

Which includdes you LYING to ChatGPT that HHH does in fact simulate its input until it matches a non-halting pattern, since the pattern you claim shows non-halting doesn't in fact show that, as it appear in the halting behavior of the direct execution of DDD which you admit halts.
When you LIE to an AI, your results will likely be wrong.
Even when you give it the truth, the results are not necessarily true as LLM AI doesn't use truth preserving operation.
So, all you are doing is showing that you can presuade a dumb machine to accept your lies.