Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct

On 7/11/2025 11:01 AM, olcott wrote:

On 7/11/2025 3:15 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-07-10 14:15:31 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 7/10/2025 4:09 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-07-09 12:45:54 +0000, olcott said:
>

>
*Here is HHH matching that pattern*
executed HHH simulates DDD that calls emulated HHH(DDD)
that simulates DDD that calls emulated emulated HHH(DDD)
>
*Here is the 197 page full execution trace of that*
https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf

>
That trace is a little long. Where in that trace is the forth level of
recursive simulation statrted?
>

After the non-terminating behavior pattern is matched
on line 996
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
HHH rejects DDD as specifying non-halting behavior.

>
This is a good example of what I meant in another comment when
I said that you don't answer questions.
>

 When you ask an incorrect question, like you did I provide
an answer to the corrected question.

On 7/9/2025 12:06 PM, olcott wrote:
 > That changes the words of the question thus becomes
 > the strawman error.