Re: man page command or convention for subheaders?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cubf misc 
Sujet : Re: man page command or convention for subheaders?
De : wbe (at) *nospam* UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid (Winston)
Groupes : comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date : 07. Mar 2024, 17:46:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ydr0gmgi4c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
I originally asked:
A FreeBSD man page I'm trying to edit uses ".Sh" for the
main headers.  Is there a macro or formatting convention
for subheaders kind of like HTML's <h1> <h2> <h3>, or
like text documents have Chapter 1, 1.1, 1.2, 2, ...?
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> kindly replied:
Check what's documented in mdoc(7).
Got it.  Thanks!
Under "Physical enclosures" are macros for surrounding text in
double quotes, single quotes, parentheses, etc.
I can understand using .Dq to get typographical quotes, but is
there an advantage to doing, say, .Qq foo rather than just
having "foo" outright as text, or using .Aq text rather than
just writing <text>?
 -WBE

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 24 * Re: man page command or convention for subheaders?3Christian Weisgerber
7 Mar 24 `* Re: man page command or convention for subheaders?2Winston
14 Mar 24  `- Re: man page command or convention for subheaders?1Felix Palmen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal