Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cubf misc 
Sujet : Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs
De : sgk (at) *nospam* REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu (Steven G. Kargl)
Groupes : comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date : 14. Mar 2024, 03:46:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ustktk$18g4k$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:17:42 +0000, Louis Epstein wrote:

Steven G. Kargl <sgk@removetroutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
 
Assuming you have a populated /usr/ports,
 
% pkg info | grep kmod
drm-515-kmod-5.15.118_3
 
what's on my system is
drm-510-kmod-5.10.163_9
and
drm-kmod-20220907_2

The latter is likely a meta-port that tries
to select the right drm-XXX-kmod port.

gpu-firmware-amd-kmod
...
gpu-firmware-radeon-kmod-verde
% portmaster -Byd drm-515-kmod
% portmaster -Byd gpu-firmware\*
% vi /etc/rc.conf
<uncomment out kld_list="radeaon_yada" line>
% sync
% shutdown -r now
 
 
The fix appears to have worked,BUT
I have not received a prompt to recompile
all applications that the freebsd.org
instructions for a binary upgrade indicated
would happen at this stage.

First rule of updating is that the kernel
and third-party modules must agree.  This
means that drm-*-kmod needs to be recompiled
if you update your kernel.

I normally upgrade applications via
 
git -C /usr/ports pull [updating ports collection]
synth status        [checking what's needed at the moment]
synth prepare-system   [updating available packages]
pkg upgrade -r Synth   [installing the new stuff]
 
and have done none of these since updating the OS except
for a synth status that tells me nothing needs upgrades
and 13 that wanted rebuilds or replacements
before the OS upgrade still do.
 
Do I have to trigger the rebuild somehow or can I update
the ports collection without screwing up?

I know nothing about synth.

--
steve



Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 24 * Re: Proliferating LLVMs17Louis Epstein
13 Mar 24 `* Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs16Louis Epstein
13 Mar 24  `* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs15Steven G. Kargl
13 Mar 24   +- Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs1John D Groenveld
13 Mar 24   `* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs13Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    +* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs11Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    i`* Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)10Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    i `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)9Steven G. Kargl
14 Mar 24    i  +* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)6John D Groenveld
14 Mar 24    i  i`* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)5Steven G. Kargl
15 Mar 24    i  i `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)4John D Groenveld
15 Mar 24    i  i  `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)3Steven G. Kargl
15 Mar 24    i  i   `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)2John D Groenveld
16 Mar 24    i  i    `- Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)1John D Groenveld
15 Mar 24    i  `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)2Louis Epstein
15 Mar 24    i   `- Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)1Steven G. Kargl
14 Mar 24    `- Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs1Steven G. Kargl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal