Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cubf misc 
Sujet : Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)
De : sgk (at) *nospam* REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu (Steven G. Kargl)
Groupes : comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date : 14. Mar 2024, 21:19:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <usvik9$1pnnp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:54:16 +0000, John D Groenveld wrote:

In article <usvdns$1oga4$1@dont-email.me>,
Steven G. Kargl <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
If I get in your situtation, I typically rebuild everything
from source.  So, first created a backup, then do
 
Forcibly reinstalling the packages might re-add whatever dependency
the OP broke by deleting LLVMs.
 
# pkg upgrade -f

If one is rebuilding everything from ports, then one is
not dealing with the nightmare of dependencies from pre-built
packages (which may be out-of-sync given the dependency tree
and how the ports tree is managed) or from stale things in
a search path.  There is also the possibility to tailor the
compiler options to match your hardware.  Packages from a
repository are likely built to run a class of hardware,
which means reduced performance.

The other advantage of rebuilding everything from source
is that it is incremental.  Install the bare minimum to get
a stable X11 window manager running, then add needed ports
while testing along the way.  You'll find what is breaking
your setup.

--
steve

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 24 * Re: Proliferating LLVMs17Louis Epstein
13 Mar 24 `* Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs16Louis Epstein
13 Mar 24  `* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs15Steven G. Kargl
13 Mar 24   +- Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs1John D Groenveld
13 Mar 24   `* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs13Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    +* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs11Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    i`* Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)10Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    i `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)9Steven G. Kargl
14 Mar 24    i  +* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)6John D Groenveld
14 Mar 24    i  i`* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)5Steven G. Kargl
15 Mar 24    i  i `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)4John D Groenveld
15 Mar 24    i  i  `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)3Steven G. Kargl
15 Mar 24    i  i   `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)2John D Groenveld
16 Mar 24    i  i    `- Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)1John D Groenveld
15 Mar 24    i  `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)2Louis Epstein
15 Mar 24    i   `- Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)1Steven G. Kargl
14 Mar 24    `- Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs1Steven G. Kargl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal