Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cubf misc 
Sujet : Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)
De : sgk (at) *nospam* REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu (Steven G. Kargl)
Groupes : comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date : 15. Mar 2024, 05:20:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ut0eqe$235g8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:57:10 +0000, John D Groenveld wrote:

In article <usvik9$1pnnp$1@dont-email.me>,
Steven G. Kargl <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
If one is rebuilding everything from ports, then one is
not dealing with the nightmare of dependencies from pre-built
packages (which may be out-of-sync given the dependency tree
and how the ports tree is managed) or from stale things in
a search path.  There is also the possibility to tailor the
 
pkg(8) can clean up outdated dependencies.
# pkg autoremove
 

Yep. It works until it doesn't.  The dependency
tree for some ports can be rather involved and
pkg seems to lose track of the entire tree or
the dependencies are never recorded.  Things may
have improved.  I used 'pkg autoremove' once, and
it led to a few broken ports because of missing
shared libraries.

If one is dealing with an unstable system as OP
as indicated.  Started with a completely bare
/usr/local may be prudent.

--
steve




Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 24 * Re: Proliferating LLVMs17Louis Epstein
13 Mar 24 `* Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs16Louis Epstein
13 Mar 24  `* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs15Steven G. Kargl
13 Mar 24   +- Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs1John D Groenveld
13 Mar 24   `* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs13Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    +* Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs11Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    i`* Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)10Louis Epstein
14 Mar 24    i `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)9Steven G. Kargl
14 Mar 24    i  +* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)6John D Groenveld
14 Mar 24    i  i`* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)5Steven G. Kargl
15 Mar 24    i  i `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)4John D Groenveld
15 Mar 24    i  i  `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)3Steven G. Kargl
15 Mar 24    i  i   `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)2John D Groenveld
16 Mar 24    i  i    `- Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)1John D Groenveld
15 Mar 24    i  `* Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)2Louis Epstein
15 Mar 24    i   `- Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs)1Steven G. Kargl
14 Mar 24    `- Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs1Steven G. Kargl

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal