Re: permission 0444 vs 0555 on /boot/kernel/*

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cubf misc 
Sujet : Re: permission 0444 vs 0555 on /boot/kernel/*
De : wbe (at) *nospam* UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid (Winston)
Groupes : comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Date : 25. Dec 2024, 02:34:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <yd34icim00.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
I originally posted:
'freebsd-update IDS' reports that most (all?) of the files in
/boot/kernel/, including /boot/kernel/kernel, should have
permission 0444, not 0555.
>
Really?
>
AFAIK, those files were written by freebsd-upgrade -r when the system
was upgraded from 14.0 to 14.1 and have only been touched since then by
freebsd-upgrade for patches, so I assume the files were installed with
0555.

to which Robin Haberkorn <robin.haberkorn@googlemail.com> replied:
They are all 0444 on my system.

The answer turned out to be:

If the files with matching names are old enough (and in older releases
of FreeBSD, those files used to be 0555) and KeepModifiedMetadata in
/etc/freebsd-update.conf is yes, then the old permissions get retained.
freebsd-upgrade didn't distinguish distribution-modified from
user-modified.  The Bugzilla discussion is at:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283110

 -WBE

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Nov 24 * permission 0444 vs 0555 on /boot/kernel/*3Winston
24 Dec 24 `* Re: permission 0444 vs 0555 on /boot/kernel/*2Robin Haberkorn
25 Dec 24  `- Re: permission 0444 vs 0555 on /boot/kernel/*1Winston

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal