Sujet : Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily
De : nicolas$george (at) *nospam* salle-s.org (Nicolas George)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmerDate : 07. Jan 2025, 16:54:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Guest of ProXad - France
Message-ID : <677d4e48$0$28053$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Flrn (0.9.20070704)
Dan Cross, dans le message <
vljbvv$gl9$1@reader2.panix.com>, a écrit :
This, however, does not follow. I don't see why "poll" is
strictly required for IO concurrency.
Well, try to do implement anything non-trivial involving I/O concurrency,
including timeouts, clients causing other clients to abort, etc., with
the common denominator of POSIX threads and come back telling us how you
managed that.
I tried, and stopped trying using threads for I/O concurrency.