Sujet : Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able
De : apple.universe (at) *nospam* posteo.net (Eric Pozharski)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmerDate : 29. Dec 2024, 18:56:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvn33ai.btv.apple.universe@freight.zombinet>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
with <
vkpkn3$ga7s$1@dont-email.me> Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
./mach build -v
with
./mach build -j6 -v
Okay, I am finally back at home and it is 21:43 o'clock.
*SKIP* [ 14 lines 1 level deep]
I cannot understand this because all references to patches 416 and 419
are commented out in the Fedora 41 spec file. I now completely removed
them and will try again...
Yay! The joy of building redhat. Expect your build dependencies being
inadequate, missing, or plainly wrong. Just saying.
p.s. No, I'm not enjoing your pain. Just to make things clear -- about
two decades ago I've upgraded RH5.1-modified to something RH6 (IIRC)
then added RH7.3 to the mix. Slackware way (rpmbuild wasn't an option
because look-ma-no-interwebs).
p.p.s. Then in The Moment of Clarity I realised that I was making a
mistake. And immediately made another.
-- Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World DominationStallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom