Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able

Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:

Because these builds take four hours, I have to admit defeat.
I simply do not have the time to make more modification
attempts.

Well, I did give it one more go and this happened:

Dec 29 16:03:10 14-5A-FC-31-E8-67 kernel: [  pid  ]   uid  tgid total_vm      rss rss_anon rss_file rss_shmem pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name
Dec 29 16:03:10 14-5A-FC-31-E8-67 kernel: [   1058]   998  1058     4009      225       32      193         0    73728      160          -900 systemd-oomd
Dec 29 16:03:10 14-5A-FC-31-E8-67 kernel: oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope,task=rustc,pid=244790,uid=1004
Dec 29 16:03:10 14-5A-FC-31-E8-67 kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 244790 (rustc) total-vm:16524360kB, anon-rss:9185412kB, file-rss:448kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:1004 pgtables:30152kB oom_score_adj:0
Dec 29 16:03:13 14-5A-FC-31-E8-67 kernel: oom_reaper: reaped process 244790 (rustc), now anon-rss:212kB, file-rss:448kB, shmem-rss:0kB


That was a single CPU build but it still failed.
My hardware just does not cut it with monstrous
builds like TB.

br,
KK